While it can only replace half of a roof, roofing experts don't recommend it. Some homeowners may consider it a cheaper option or think it saves time. From an expert's point of view, replacing half the roof often brings more harm (or expense) than benefits. Technically, yes, only part of a roof can be replaced.
However, it's not something we usually recommend. When a roofer comes out to see the damage, they can inform him of the amount of damage present on the roof cover or subfloor. If the subfloor and the damage are still in good condition, the roofer can replace the shingles where they are missing. That's why it's so important to talk to your roofer.
As more time goes by without repairing missing shingles, more problems can arise with the roof subfloor. Once this part of the roof is damaged, the cost and labor required to replace or repair it are much higher. The recommended option for most roofers and contractors, a tear is a complete replacement. This means new roof tiles, covers, door covers and subfloors and replacements for any damaged or rotten structures.
The main drawback of this is the starting price. Replacing an entire roof will cost you money, so talk to your insurer. Many roofing companies also offer financing options. While partially replacing a roof is not recommended, there are some situations where it is acceptable and necessary to replace sections and parts of the roofing system.
Then you'll wonder if it's worth replacing sections of your roof instead of the entire roofing system. The problem is that you may have to replace the entire roof sooner than you would if you had replaced it all at once. In addition, depending on age, the roof may be too brittle or worn to withstand a partial replacement. Perhaps the most obvious reason from an external point of view is that replacing just half of a roof can be difficult in terms of aesthetics.
It can still be difficult to match the color of the roof and the shingles, which makes stains noticeable, but they are still effective and more affordable than replacing an entire roof. The problem here often comes from insurance companies, which may not pay for the full repair and replacement of the roof. Roofing professionals also argue that it's more complex to replace just half of a roof than an entire roof, meaning it could be as expensive as replacing an entire roof. Regardless of whether your home has just faced a windstorm, was defeated by a fallen tree, or damaged by hail, it's hard to justify a complete roof replacement if only part of it is affected.
When half or more of the roof is damaged, it can be tempting to replace the damaged half to save time and money. While partially replacing a roof is not recommended, there are some situations where it is acceptable and necessary to replace parts and parts of the roof. Even if you replaced half of your roof, you and your house would be stuck with two halves of a roof with a different lifespan. It's also important to note that most roofing warranties require that you replace the entire roof if even a small part is damaged.
In general, if the roof is old or badly damaged, it is best to schedule a complete replacement rather than a partial one. If the damage is widespread or if your roof is nearing the end of its useful life, you may need to replace it completely. In the end, if your roof only needs to replace a few shingles or do some minor patches, you can have a roofer do those small repairs for you.